Blog > Political Update

When it comes to chemical exposures, not all American communities are created equal

Posted on November 12, 2010

Not all American communities are created the same By Simone Sinogles, Development Coordinator
Indigenous Environmental Network
Bemidji, Minnesota

Like millions of other Americans, I am very concerned about how toxic chemicals in ordinary products are affecting my community’s health, and believe it’s time for Congress to do something about it. Unlike most Americans, the community I’m writing about today includes an environmental justice “hot spot,” which means that, in addition to worrying about things like bisphenol A (BPA) in baby bottles, my friends and family are contending with toxic chemicals left over from an industrial site.

I live near the small city of Cass Lake on the Leech Lake reservation in Northern Minnesota. This area is home to the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe, one of many Anishinaabe communities in this region, and the site of the former St. Regis Paper Company wood treatment plant. The levels of dioxins left over from the old plant are so high in some areas that families have been advised not to let their children play in their own back yards. It’s been a Superfund site since 1984. The tribe has been working hard to clean up the site and ensure the safety of their community, but unfortunately, as is the case far too often, they were left with the bulk of the clean up work when the company left.

...in addition to worrying about things like bisphenol A (BPA)...my friends and family are contending with toxic chemicals left over from an industrial site.

The St. Regis Paper Company operated its wood treatment plant near downtown Cass Lake for nearly 30 years. To make things like telephone poles, they pressure-treated lumber with creosote, pentachlorophenol (PCP), and copper chromium arsenate. Today we know that those chemicals contain dioxin, which can cause cancer. For decades, they dumped sludge from the wood treatment facility into disposal ponds, or buried or burned it at the nearby city landfill.

There have been some clean-up efforts, but nothing that can make certain areas in Cass Lake truly safe. On top of the daily dose of chemicals we receive just by participating in the modern world, the people in this community are contending with the aftermath of decades of dioxin poisoning. The results are clear to anyone who lives there. The EPA has acknowledged that this community contains unusually high levels of dioxin, but they stop short of acknowledging that it is causing health problems. Community members know differently — people in the most impacted areas suffer higher rates of cancer that we attribute to their exposure to these chemicals.

In addition to the dioxin, we are also contending with the fact that the 60-year-old pipelines running under the Leech Lake reservation and surrounding communities carrying tar sands oil and other chemicals are beginning to corrode and leak into our groundwater. The pipes are operated by Endbridge, the same company responsible for the ruptured pipes that leaked at least a million gallons of oil and other chemicals into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan last summer.

Our community also struggles with abnormally high rates of obesity and diabetes, a legacy of our transition from the traditional Anishinaabe diet of fresh game and fish, forest greens, and wild rice to the diet of poor Americans — cheap, processed food.

I am describing a particular community, but there are hundreds more just like us. Where are they? You won’t find them in the Hamptons or Beverly Hills. Environmental “hot spots” tend to flare up in low-income neighborhoods, populated by people of color and indigenous peoples — places where people haven’t accumulated enough political clout to keep the industrial polluters away, or who are held hostage to economic pressures. Indigenous communities are hit especially hard because reservations and reserves have large areas of land attractive to the waste industry and which hold much of the remaining fossil fuel resources.

 

Today, toxic chemicals are not isolated to toxic waste sites or industrial plants — they have pervaded every aspect of our lives. Rich, poor, urban, rural, Anishinaabe, white, young, old — our outdated chemical policy is an injustice to all Americans.

 

Ultimately, it’s going to take Congressional action to fix the broken chemical regulatory system. Both the House and the Senate have introduced new legislation (H.R. 5820 and S. 3209) that would make it much harder to put toxic chemicals in things like baby bottles. The proposals also create a new program to identify communities that are “hot spots” for toxic chemicals, and to take action to reduce the harm to these communities. This provision is important because, when it comes to toxic chemicals, not all American communities are created equal.

We hope Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar will be a leader to ensure the strongest bill possible passes through her position on the Environmental and Public Works Committee. We need Senator Klobuchar to take action to make sure everyone — no matter their budget or location — has access to safe, non-toxic products and places.


Comments

This is horrible. We have a similar situation here in RI from a company Hersh Chemical (sp?) They produced the red dye found in Coca-Cola, Budweiser, etc. When told they would either have to clean up the toxic ponds due to them not being safe, they were given an option to sell and that whomever bought them would not have to clean it up for at least 30 years or something to that effect.

The company that bought it was Clariant and they are not doing anything about it. Probably going to sell it again when the time is up and postpone it for another 30 years.

Anyway, there have been fish found with more than one head, snakes, frogs, etc with the same and similar disformities. A friend of mine that was working there had to go into the chemical room where you have to wear full toxin gear, then wash down to detoxify themselves afterwards, 1x a month and he came down with the rarest form of cancer there is and is only caused by the chemical they use.

What a cooincidence huh? They are actually trying to deny that this was the cause. WOW. This type of destroying not only the environment but also peoples lives need to stop and action needs to be taken!

Posted by: V | Nov 17, 2010 6:22:33 AM

This is disgusting! The people who polluted the area should be made to clean it up! Or better yet, don't pollute our only* living space to begin with! (* one planet that sustains human life)

Posted by: Shelly | Nov 15, 2010 12:20:25 PM

Post a comment

User comments reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families. We reserve the right to delete comments that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate. We also reserve the right to delete duplicate comments, or comments that have no relationship to the original post.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this blog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In